Lecture - Summary
So then I'll give of my lecture, D
Who? Michael Grewe
What? "The dogs, he probably brought up ...!" A lecture on the subject of dog training
Where? House score, Norddeich
When? 19:00 clock inlet, 19:30 Beginning
costs? 20.00 €
The name "Michael Grewe," told me before the talk but what, but I've been busy with him or his methods never more intense. I found on my research, aware of the principles and paradigms omitted, for which he works to be neutral and objective in this course can go. I did this, I've only experienced the lecture is co-founder of Canine Centre CANIS.
I was right on time at 18:00 of clock set off at home. I could already think I will have problems finding the venue. However, it was this time not found on the venue but more of a parking space. Then I arrived on time at 19:00 clock (normal arrival time would have been the same route clock 18:30) and still had such a free choice of seats.
on time at 19:30 of the clock began to talk then. As far as I remember correctly Michael Grewe started trying to talk about "fighting dogs" and the accompanying regulations. He told of the trigger / reason of the character tests and the meaning / meaninglessness. Then he defined dog training and distinguishes them from the training. He went to the sources of information regarding the dog training (breeder's Food Company, ...) and its credibility / utility one. He places special emphasis on explaining to us where to begin dog training, the skills required in man to dog training and the rules that the coexistence of man and dog is essential.
Michael Grewe we tried to carry on with his speech is clear, for the dog training is necessary, above all feeling. But still feel is not all. One must be as consistent and assertive have. It also goes not to read many books and control techniques to have a feel for it without. Without the dog would not take a serious, because I played so only the security and consistency. The notice of the dog. However you feel, then takes it, the whole appearance alters, and the dog realizes that it is serious and is able to represent his views and commands enforced. Michael Grewe is also of the opinion that one should educate dog without treats. Finally, the dog obey commands in any situation because he wants it himself and knows that he must, not because the dog gets to eat something and then it runs the risk because the dog can not hear without the prospect of treats would. If this is the case, however, should not you throw cotton balls to the dog then finally felt heard after decades. It should be clear to the dog clearly what is desired and what is not. Necessary even as he called it, by hand. Explains he has "hands" do not like the look or should. I have personally designed for me that one should not use the hand within the meaning of hitting or something else but, yes, what is wrong with low levels of physical violence that the dog does not hurt but he makes clear. (Note to cart me: I am not "Wattebäuschel 'Group; D)
Michael Grewe packed his talk with humor and compares the dog training often with parenting, it was a casual event. He never generalized gescherrt things or the same brush. He stressed that it is of course always exceptions, and it varies from case to case.
I found the speech entertaining. You could laugh and "think" something about the experience of the dogs. The basic idea and its approaches, I find it good. Some arguments I could be so signed without further notice. Took the view "work without treats" I find not so sparkling. I feed my dog like; D Of course, not everything should be rewarded with treats. And executed for each Command has not at all. To the dog, however, to make clear what I want from him, I think it's good to use and relief treats. I can recommend this lecture to anyone who wants to even discover a new perspective in terms of dog training, not a part of Wattebäuschelfraktion and want to spend a fun evening.
